Woke Up Late? Charlie Hebdo Explained…

In case you are just now alerted to the fact that something is desperately wrong in our world but missed much of the background on the Paris Shootings, this article from Dr. Richard Presser will sum it up nicely for you. Brilliant, Richard. Thank you.

And I learned a few things, too. I really hope we can leave this event behind now, though. I am weary of thinking about it and have more positive thought vibrations to entertain. 

If you don’t think it’s a conspiracy, read it again. It’s part of amassive conspiracy to enslave Humanity. They’re already telling us what we can and can’t share on the Internet and that they will demand access to your every email and phone message. You’re damn right it’s a conspiracy. And we’re onto them. Share this and wake up a few more people, would you? Thank you.  ~ BP

The Paris False Flag Shootings and What They Mean for Your Future

I want to draw together the picture that I see regarding the so-called Paris shootings and their aftermath. I have already shared with you some examples of the evidence that this event was a false flag event. Let’s briefly revisit this.

Firstly, let me say that YouTube has been working overtime to remove most of the videos that have revealed exactly what occurred. We shouldn’t be surprised.

This summary from Gordon Duff covers most of the issues, including a brief video of an AK47 being fired at a watermelon. Enough said.

A very funny video of a supposed dead policeman taking a selfie when he thought he was hidden behind a car has disappeared. A pity I didn’t grab it. It was hysterical.

Then we have this article with more evidence. The one undeniable element here is the second alignment line with the left front wheel that appeared whilst the gunmen were supposedly shooting the police. You need the HD original video here to see it clearly.

This video analyses the so-called shooting in some detail, including the ridiculous stories about the supposed terrorists. And this little video just gets it.

So, that this was a false flag event is not open to question. And no-one that is either listening to the media or the Internet can fail to see and hear the huge outcry about this apparent outrage. And within a day or two there were stories and opinion pieces and follow up actions based upon the so-called truth that move the world so far on from the false event, the average person has no clue what occurred, nor would they even contemplate that they’ve been conned. We saw it at 9/11, at Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombings, etc. All false flags and now very well documented proof thereof.

Even so, many people that, today, I had hoped would begin to see through this game are like deer in the headlights, and if they don’t wake up they are about to get run over. Again.

I had before now not heard of this guy who calls himself redsilverj (thanks, Molly), but in my view this video does just an outstanding job of placing this event in its context. It runs just over half an hour, but if you want to grasp the issues, it is a small investment to make. Redsilverj explains how this is really France’s 9/11 and how it is advancing the New World Order agenda.

Here is a wonderful piece by Claudio, one of the Internet’s freedom fighters, he has called Manipulation of Terror – and yet he doesn’t even get the false flag bit. And he wrote it before he heard David Cameron’s announcement that he wants to ban encryption. In the name of terrorism, of course.

And a couple of tweets I saw in response to this announcement that I have to share:

ISIS guy 1: I know, let’s use cryptography to hide our messages!
ISIS guy 2: We can’t, it’s against the law in the UK.
ISIS guy 1: Oh, OK.


NK hacks Sony for a movie. Charlie Hebdo attacked by terrorists. UK wants to ban encryption. Go home reality, you are drunk.

And reality is drunk. On fear and belief in what the media and so-called world leaders pour forth.

And to this we can add the public announcement that the so-called Five Eyes partners are to meet in London on January 22nd. “We’re going to have a meeting with our Five Eyes allies in London and this is serious stuff. Terrorism will be there” on the agenda, Blaney told CTV television.

So, we have a high level of anti-Muslim hysteria cranked up, effectively martial law in France, Cameron announcing plans to legislate against encryption, which impacts you and me and also makes effective journalism impossible, and the supposedly secret Five Eyes partners publicly announcing their plans to crank up their agenda against terrorism (which they invented along with Israel on command from the guys behind the scenes). Not bad, so far.

Do you see how this stuff works? Are people going to say enough is enough? Know that if the goons that run our world behind the scenes (more about this in coming days) get away with this in Britain, it will soon get rolled out across the planet. No encryption. Ohh… it’ll be OK if you’re talking to your bank, of course. But no PGP, no Tor, no Signal, etc. All dead and true journalism along with it.

I’m drawn to share with you this post from a programmer who’s right now attending Moxie Marlinspike’s Winter Break of Code in Hawaii, working on improvements to Signal, TextSecure, RedPhone, etc. It’s so full of the uncompromised optimism and joy of youth, working on something that he knows is making a difference to people’s privacy, giving freely of his time to a project that is given free of charge to the world. And this stuff is at the heart of what Cameron’s legislation is about, because the spooks can’t snoop on it. Ever. It uses great encryption, but it’s like an ethereal summer breeze, wisping in and gone.

These goons who we saw linking arms in so-called solidarity are the scum of the Earth. If they weren’t, they wouldn’t be allowed to have those roles (more on this, soon, too). They’re all just part of the puppet show we are persuaded by the mainstream media to be real. And they will continue to step forward unless we stop them.

As I contemplate this, I’m reminded of the story Dr. Rima Laibow shared in her interview with Kate Johnston. She demonstrated what can be done through the mobilisation of a protest against a plan to vaccinate all American citizens in response to the Level 6 global swine flu pandemic that was declared in June 2009, a vaccination which was designed to cause all Americans to be infertile, amongst other conditions. Rima organised a protest that stopped this plan in its tracks. Listen to her story about this. You need to understand how sinister these people are. Within 11 days, 3 1/2 million emails flooded the inboxes of government and it was stopped. Rima has provided us with a leadership example and shown that it works. Indeed, if you haven’t watched the entire interview, I commend it.

Now, whilst this issue is not a life and death one, Cameron’s proposed encryption ban is the first step down the road of ensuring none of us can keep anything private from their prying eyes. And THEY HAVE NO DAMNED RIGHT to do this, and Rima’s example is one that those of you in Britain can act upon, in your own interest and in the interests of the rest of the world.

Take action, and stop these goons in their tracks while the rest of us tap a few more people on the shoulder and show them what’s going on.


The Charlie Hebdo Attack: Characteristics of a False Flag Operation?


The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the characteristics of a false flag operation. The attack on the cartoonists’ office was a disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with highly trained special forces; yet the suspects who were later corralled and killed seemed bumbling and unprofessional. It is like two different sets of people.

Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers.

It is a plausible inference that the ID left behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. An important fact that supports this inference is the report that the third suspect in the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing his name circulating on social media as a suspect realized the danger he was in and quickly turned himself into the police for protection against being murdered by security forces as a terrorist.

Hamyd Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi. If so, this makes him the despoiler of a false flag attack. Authorities will have to say that despite being wrong about Mourad, they were right about the Kouachi brothers. Alternatively, Mourad could be coerced or tortured into some sort of confession that supports the official story. https://www.intellihub.com/18-year-old-charlie-hebdo-suspect-surrenders-police-claims-alibi/


The American and European media have ignored the fact that Mourad turned himself in for protection from being killed as a terrorist as he has an alibi. I googled Hamid Mourad and all I found (January 12) was the main US and European media reporting that the third suspect had turned himself in. The reason for his surrender was left out of the reports. The news was reported in a way that gave credence to the accusation that the suspect who turned himself in was part of the attack on Charlie Hebdo. Not a single US mainstream media source reported that the alleged suspect turned himself in because he has an ironclad alibi.

Some media merely reported Mourad’s surrender in a headline with no coverage in the report. The list that I googled includes the Washington Post (January 7 by Griff Witte and Anthony Faiola); Die Welt (Germany) “One suspect has turned himself in to police in connection with Wednesday’s massacre at the offices of Parisian satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo;” ABC News (January 7) “Youngest suspect in Charlie Hebdo Attack turns himself in;” CNN (January 8) “Citing sources, the Agence France Presse news agency reported that an 18-year-old suspect in the attack had surrendered to police.”

Another puzzle in the official story that remains unreported by the presstitute media is the alleged suicide of a high ranking member of the French Judicial Police who had an important role in the Charlie Hebdo investigation. For unknown reasons, Helric Fredou, a police official involved in the most important investigation of a lifetime, decided to kill himself in his police office on January 7 or January 8 (both dates are reported in the foreign media) in the middle of the night while writing his report on his investigation. A google search as of 6pm EST January 13 turns up no mainstream US media report of this event. The alternative media reports it, as do some UK newspapers, but without suspicion or mention whether his report has disappeared. The official story is that Fredou was suffering from “depression” and “burnout,” but no evidence is provided. Depression and burnout are the standard explanations of mysterious deaths that have unsettling implications.

Once again we see the US print and TV media serving as a ministry of propaganda for Washington. In place of investigation, the media repeats the government’s implausible story.


It behoves us all to think. Why would Muslims be more outraged by cartoons in a Paris magazine than by hundreds of thousands of Muslims killed by Washington and its French and NATO vassals in seven countries during the past 14 years?

If Muslims wanted to make a point of the cartoons, why not bring a hate crime charge or lawsuit? Imagine what would happen to a European magazine that dared to satirize Jews in the way Charlie Hebdo satirized Muslims. Indeed, in Europe people are imprisoned for investigating the holocaust without entirely confirming every aspect of it.

If a Muslim lawsuit was deep-sixed by French authorities, the Muslims would have made their point. Killing people merely contributes to the demonization of Muslims, a result that only serves Washington’s wars against Muslim countries.

If Muslims are responsible for the attack on Charlie Hebdo, what Muslim goal did they achieve? None whatsoever. Indeed, the attack attributed to Muslims has ended French and European sympathy and support for Palestine and European opposition to more US wars against Muslims. Just recently France had voted in the UN with Palestine against the US-Israeli position. This assertion of an independent French foreign policy was reinforced by the recent statement by the President of France that the economic sanctions against Russia should be terminated.

Clearly, France was showing too much foreign policy independence. The attack on Charlie Hebdo serves to cow France and place France back under Washington’s thumb.

Some will contend that Muslims are sufficiently stupid to shoot themselves in the head in this way. But how do we reconcile such alleged stupidity with the alleged Muslim 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo professional attacks?

images (5)

If we believe the official story, the 9/11 attack on the US shows that 19 Muslims, largely Saudis, without any government or intelligence service support, outwitted not only all 16 US intelligence agencies, the National Security Council, Dick Cheney and all the neoconservatives in high positions throughout the US government, and airport security, but also the intelligence services of NATO and Israel’s Mossad. How can such intelligent and capable people, who delivered the most humiliating blow in world history to an alleged Superpower with no difficulty whatsoever despite giving every indication of their intentions, possibly be so stupid as to shoot themselves in the head when they could have thrown France into turmoil with a mere lawsuit?

The Charlie Hebdo story simply doesn’t wash. If you believe it, you are no match for a Muslim.

Some who think that they are experts will say that a false flag attack in France would be impossible without the cooperation of French intelligence. To this I say that it is practically a certainty that the CIA has more control over French intelligence than does the President of France. Operation Gladio proves this. The largest part of the government of Italy was ignorant of the bombings conducted by the CIA and Italian Intelligence against European women and children and blamed on communists in order to diminish the communist vote in elections.

Americans are a pitifully misinformed people. All of history is a history of false flag operations. Yet Americans dismiss such proven operations as “conspiracy theories,” which merely proves that government has successfully brainwashed insouciant Americans and deprived them of the ability to recognize the truth.

Americans are the foremost among the captive nations.

Who will liberate them?